top of page

Why Fine-Tuning Your LLM Can Spell Disaster in the AI World

Exploring the pitfalls of fine-tuning large language models and presenting safer, more effective alternatives for knowledge integration in AI Systems.


Imagine you have a brilliant, highly organized librarian named "Lexi." Lexi has read every book in the world and knows where everything is. You want her to learn about a brand new topic, say, "The History of Purple Squirrels."


In the fast-evolving world of AI, many teams think the best way to teach Lexi new things is to "re-educate" her directly – a process called fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs). But according to Devansh’s widely shared article, this approach isn't just slow; it could actually make Lexi forget other important things she knows (Devansh, 2025).


The Myth of "Re-educating" Your Librarian for New Facts

At first glance, re-educating Lexi seems logical: give her a bunch of new books on purple squirrels, and she'll just absorb the knowledge. But here's the catch: Lexi isn't a blank slate. She's a highly complex mind where every single memory and connection is intricately linked. Her "neurons" (like the individual connections in her brain) store a vast web of interdependent information (Devansh, 2025).


If you try to directly re-educate Lexi on purple squirrels, you risk overwriting her existing, valuable knowledge. As Devansh puts it, "neurons are valuable, finite resources." It's not free to change them; doing so can lead to unexpected problems, like Lexi suddenly acting biased, forgetting how to find other information, or even making up facts (hallucinations) (Devansh, 2025).


Supporting Research

Recent studies back this up:

  • Trying to make Lexi "safer" through direct re-education has been shown to drastically change her overall behavior. One study found that after being re-educated for safety, a model that used to mention many different nationalities started favoring only one, and shifted from mentioning mostly male examples to almost entirely female ones (Devansh, 2025).

  • The phenomenon of "catastrophic forgetting"—where learning something new causes Lexi to forget things she previously knew—is a well-known issue in how these "brains" work (Goodfellow, Bengio, & Courville, 2016).

  • Research from major AI labs like Anthropic and OpenAI has shown that directly re-educating Lexi can introduce new biases or make existing ones worse, especially if you're not extremely careful about what you teach her and how (Bai et al., 2022).


Better Alternatives: Smart, Modular Ways to Teach Lexi New Things

Instead of directly re-educating Lexi, Devansh recommends more modular approaches that keep her core knowledge intact:

  1. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Give Lexi a Research Assistant. Imagine giving Lexi a dedicated "Purple Squirrel Encyclopedia." When someone asks her about purple squirrels, she doesn't try to remember everything herself. Instead, she quickly consults her encyclopedia in the moment to pull out the relevant facts. This is perfect for large amounts of new information and avoids messing with Lexi's main brain (Devansh, 2025).

  2. Adapter Modules & LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation): Add a "Purple Squirrel" Sticky Note. These techniques are like adding small, specialized sticky notes to Lexi's existing knowledge. These sticky notes contain new capabilities or information. They're quick, cheap, and much safer than trying to rewrite entire sections of her brain (Hu et al., 2021).

  3. Contextual Prompting: Just Ask Lexi the Right Way. Sometimes, the best way to get Lexi to tell you about purple squirrels isn't to re-educate her at all. It's to simply ask her the question in a very clear, specific way that guides her to the right information she already has, or to the "Purple Squirrel Encyclopedia" you gave her. Knowing how to ask the right questions (prompt engineering) is a valuable skill that's often overlooked (Devansh, 2025).


Strong Takeaway

Directly re-educating your AI (fine-tuning) isn't a magic solution; it's a risky, often unnecessary method for updating these complex "brains." If your goal is to build flexible AI systems that can grow, modular additions are the way forward. Treat your AI's "neurons" like precious real estate: don't bulldoze the house when you can simply build a useful new annex next door.


References:


Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., Kernion, J., Jones, A., ... & Amodei, D. (2022). Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with RLHF. Anthropic. https://www.anthropic.com/index/training-a-helpful-and-harmless-assistant-with-rlhf


Devansh. (2025, June 12). Fine-Tuning LLMs is a Huge Waste of Time. Medium. https://medium.com/@tvscitechtalk/list/finetuning-your-llms-with-unsloth-814cfc9b272f


Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.


Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, L., ... & Chen, W. (2021). LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page